Curriculum for Specialty Certificate Examination in Gastroenterology

Countdown to the Examination

Saturday, 17 November 2012

Acute Pancreatitis


In the western world gallstones and alcohol account for the vast majority of cases.
Other causes include hyperlipidaemia, hypercalcaemia, medications, trauma, viral infection and ERCP.

The severity of the pancreatitis may range from mild and self-limiting to extremely severe with extensive pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis as well as haemorrhage. In its most severe form the mortality rises to between 40-50%.
Pathogenesis
Mechanisms by which pancreatic necrosis occurs remain speculative. Any theory must take into account how a very diverse group of aetiological factors can produce the same end point.
There is some suggestion that the final common pathway is a marked elevation of intracellular calcium which in turn leads to activation of intracellular proteases. It is these activated enzymes which are responsible for cellular necrosis.
In the case of gallstone-related pancreatitis it is believed stones occlude the pancreatic drainage at the level of the ampulla leading to pancreatic ductular hypertension. Such ductular hypertension has been shown in animal models to increase cytosolic free ionized calcium. There is also evidence that alcohol interferes with calcium homeostasis in pancreatic acinar cells.




Clinical features
Acute pancreatitis is a differential diagnosis in any patient with upper abdominal pain.
The pain usually begins in the epigastrium accompanied by nausea and vomiting.
As inflammation spreads throughout the peritoneal cavity the pain becomes more intense. Involvement of the retroperitoneum frequently leads to back pain.
The patient may give a history of previous similar episodes or be known to have gallstones. An attack may follow an alcoholic binge. However, in many cases there are no obvious aetiological factors.

severity
Initial assessment: clinical + amylase/ lipase + organ failure + APACH II
24-48 hours: Glasgow score and CRP
72 hours: CT or MRI. Complete extent of pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis may only be clear after 72 hr after the onset.
Treatment
The initial management of acute pancreatitis is similar, whatever the cause.
A multiple factor scoring system (ideally APACHE II with a modification for obesity) should be carried out at the end of the first 24 hours after presentation to allow identification of the 25% of patients with a predicted severe attack. This should be repeated at 48 hours to identify a further subgroup who appear to be moving into the severe category.
These patients should then be managed on a high-dependency or intensive care unit. Even patients outside of the severe category may require considerable supportive care.
Early fluid losses in acute pancreatitis may be large, requiring well-maintained intravenous access as well as a central line and urinary catheter to monitor circulating volume and renal function.
  • Nasogastric suction prevents abdominal distension and vomitus and hence the risk of aspiration pneumonia.
  • Baseline arterial blood gases determine the need for continuous oxygen administration.
  • Prophylactic antibiotics. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, e.g. cefuroxime or aztreonam, reduce the risk of infective complications and are given from the outset. 20 % develop extra-pancreatic infection. Use of routine prophylactic antibiotic is not recommended.
  • Analgesia requirements. Pethidine and tramadol are the drugs of choice, usually administered by a patient control system. The morphine derivatives should be avoided because they can cause sphincter of Oddi contraction.
  • Feeding. In patients with a severe episode there is little likelihood of oral nutrition for a number of weeks. Total parenteral nutrition has been associated with a high risk of infection and has been replaced by enteral nutrition. This is administered via a nasojejunal tube, which is well tolerated and can maintain adequate nutritional input. The nasojejunal position of the feeding tube placed endoscopically overcomes the frequent problem of gastric paresis and there is less likelihood of pancreatic stimulation.
In a small proportion of patients, multiorgan failure will develop in the first few days after presentation reflecting the extent of pancreatic necrosis. Such patients will require positive-pressure ventilation and often renal support. The mortality in this group is extremely high (in excess of 80%).
Gallstone-related pancreatitis
In patients with gallstone-related pancreatitis and associated cholangitis, endoscopic intervention with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is of proven benefit and is the treatment of choice. In the absence of cholangitis, sphincterotomy and stone extraction is only of proven benefit when the episode of pancreatitis is predicted as severe. In less severe cases of gallstone-related pancreatitis intervention can be deferred until full recovery is obtained (an approximate 6-week period).

11 comments:

  1. Which of the following acute pancreatitis fluid resuscitation methods has been shown to decrease serum CRP after 24 hours in a recent randomized controlled clinical trial?

    A. Normal saline alone

    B. Normal saline with methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol)

    C. Lactated Ringers alone

    D. Lactated Ringers with IL-10

    correct answer C,
    IV fluid resuscitation is critically important in the early management of acute pancreatitis. A recent RCT comparing Lactated Ringers (LR) to normal saline (NS) showed that subjects resuscitated with LR had lower serum CRP levels after 24 hours of resuscitation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The best choice for the initial imaging modality in the evaluation of acute pancreatitis patients in the emergency unit is which of the following:

    A. Transabdominal ultrasound

    B. Endoscopic ultrasound

    C. ERCP

    D. Computed tomography

    E. MRI / MRCP

    correct answer A,

    Current ACG Practice Guidelines recommend an ultrasound as the initial imaging modality in acute pancreatitis. This is not for assessment of severity of the disease, but to determine if gallstones may be the etiology of the disease. Endoscopic ultrasound is helpful to determine if there is a retained stone in the common bile duct, but would not be part of the initial evaluation. If choledocholithiasis is highly suspected or confirmed, then ERCP is appropriate, but it is not used in evaluation or diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. While CT scan can aid in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, and several severity scoring systems have been reported, a recent study reported no added benefit of CT over other severity predictors in the early management of the patient with acute pancreatitis. MRI/MRCP is used to assess for choledocholithiasis in patients with acute pancreatitis, but not in the initial evaluation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A 68-year-old man has acute pancreatitis. He was admitted to hospital 48 hours ago. Which of the following factors portend a poor prognosis?

    1-Calcium <2.0
    2-CRP <20
    3-Glucose <10
    4-Urea <16
    5-WCC <12


    The following portend a poor prognosis in patients with acute pancreatitis:

    WCC >15
    Urea >16
    Calcium <2.0
    Glucose >10
    CRP >150.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A patient is admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute pancreatitis. Which of the following statements regarding the ICU management of acute pancreatitis is true?

    1-Nutrition should be provided by total parenteral nutrition (TPN) until the serum lipase is less than three times normal.
    2-Antibiotics should be initiated empirically.
    3-Oxygen by nasal cannula should be administered.
    4-Enterally administered probiotics should be initiated.

    Although refeeding pancreatitis occurs more frequently if the serum lipase is more than threefold elevated, nasojejunal feedings are preferred over TPN. The use of empirical antibiotics is not recommended. Convincing evidence that probiotics decrease infectious complications in acute pancreatitis is scarce. Due to the common and indolent nature of hypoxemia affecting patients with acute pancreatitis, current guidelines recommend the initial routine use of nasal cannula oxygen for all patients with acute pancreatitis.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A patient is in the ICU with acute pancreatitis. The patient’s condition has stabilized, and the issue of nutrition is being addressed. Which statement regarding the provision of nutrition in acute pancreatitis is true?

    1-When initiating a diet, a low-fat diet has been shown to be as safe as a clear liquid diet.
    2-Compared with nasojejunal feeding, TPN has been shown to decrease the length of stay.
    3-Studies have shown that nasoenteric tube feeding is better tolerated than nasogastric tube feeding.
    4-Although nasojejunal feedings reduce septic complications, the use of TPN is more cost-effective in the ICU setting.

    Once refeeding is begun, a low-fat diet seems to be comparable to a clear liquid diet as the initial meal. Nasojejunal tube feeds have been shown to normalize blood glucose levels, decrease septic complications, decrease total complications, improve acute phase response markers, improve disease severity scores, and decrease costs compared with the administration of TPN. Nasojejunal tube feeds have not been reliably shown to be better tolerated than nasogastric tube feeds.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A 38-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with several hours of nausea and severe abdominal pain. The patient describes her pain as unrelenting midepigastric pain radiating to her back. On examination, the patient is in the fetal position and reluctant to move. She is tachycardic and has a low-grade fever. Orthostatic hypotension is noted. Laboratory study results are remarkable for an amylase level of 1100 and a lipase level of 1900. Which of the following tests is most appropriate for assessing the severity of her illness?

    1-Abdominal radiograph (kidneys, ureter, bladder [KUB])
    2-Abdominal ultrasonography (US)
    3-Computed tomography (CT)
    4-Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    5-Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

    CT is the modality of choice to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis and the presence of associated complications. More specifically, CT with dynamic intravenous contrast injection can determine the presence and extent of pancreatic necrosis, which remains the primary determinant of length of hospitalization and mortality. Although a KUB can rule out other etiologies for abdominal pain, it does not directly image the pancreas. Imaging by transabdominal US is severely limited by poor transmission of ultrasound waves through bowel gas that normally surrounds the pancreas. MRI is not superior to CT for imaging in acute pancreatitis and is both less available and more expensive. ERCP is contraindicated in acute pancreatitis unless there is evidence of concurrent cholangitis.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In the above patient with AP, the other admission laboratories included white blood cell (WBC) count of 22,000, hemoglobin level of 15, total bilirubin level of 3.2 mg/dL, alkaline phosphatase level of 375 IU/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level of 130 IU/L, alanine aminotransferase level of 170 IU/L, and Po2 of 85. In this patient, which of the following laboratory studies is most indicative of severe disease?

    1-Alkaline phosphatase
    2-Amylase
    3-AST level
    4-WBC count
    5-Bilirubin

    In acute pancreatitis, the Ranson criteria have been time-tested indicators of disease severity and prognosis. Ranson criteria include five admission criteria:
    (1) age older than 55,
    (2) WBC count greater than 16,000,
    (3) glucose level greater than 200,
    (4) lactate dehydrogenase level greater than 350,
    (5) AST level greater than 250,

    and five criteria determined at 48 hours:
    (1) hematocrit decrease more than 10,
    (2) BUN increase more than 5,
    (3) calcium less than 8,
    (4) Po2 less than 60,
    (5) base deficit more than 4.

    Amylase and lipase levels are not good predictors of disease severity or prognosis.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Which is an accurate relationship between gallstones and pancreatitis?

    1-Pancreatitis develops in approximately 5% of patients with gallstones.
    2-Gallstones cause approximately 65% of all cases of acute pancreatitis.
    3-Gallstone pancreatitis occurs with equal frequency in men and women.
    4-Smoking increases the risk of gallstone pancreatitis.

    Gallstones cause approximately 40% of cases of acute pancreatitis, although pancreatitis develops in only 3% to 7% of patients with gallstones. Gallstone pancreatitis is more common in women than men because gallstones are more frequent in women. Smoking increases the risk of alcoholic and idiopathic pancreatitis, but not gallstone pancreatitis.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Poor prognostic indicators in the first 48 hours of acute pancreatitis include:
    - age is greater than55 years
    - WCC is greater than 15
    - glucose is greater than 10
    - urea is greater than 16
    - albumin is less than 30 g/L
    - ALT is greater than 200
    - calcium is less than 2
    - LDH is greater than 600
    - PaO2 is less than 8

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi,
    Took Onglyza off and on for a year. I  have an enlarged adrenal gland. Still I await the outcome of that CT, but I know that much. Will find out more.
    I had the CT because of chronic pancreatic pain that started out as "attacks" from a couple of times a month to finally after 3 months of use without interruption, "attacks" 2-3 times a week. My PA put Onglyza on my allergies list.
    In the meantime, I lost almost 50 lbs in 5 months due to illness. Loss of appetite, pancreatic pain, chronic diarrhea, then eventually, inability to move my bowels. Severe back pain from the pancreas, and severe chest pain sent me to the ER where I was worked up for cardiac pain. I was cardiac cleared, but told my amylase was very low.
    Still seeking a diagnosis, but I lay the blame squarely on Onglyza. I'd had pancreatic issues in the past, and argued with the PA that prescribed it, she was calling me non-compliant, and I feared repercussion from my insurance company.
    I even took an article about the dangers of Onglyza, particularly in patients with a history, and she made me feel foolish.
    I wish I had listened to my instincts, I fear not only damage to my pancreas that is irreversible, but also severe damage to my left kidney, though I have bilateral kidney pain.
    I was off all diabetes meds, and control sugars strictly low to no carb. I can barely eat anymore, I have severe anorexia.
    I would warn anyone taking Onglyza to consider a change and try Dr Itua Herbal Medicine, and anyone considering taking it, to select a different avenue. I have been suffering severely for about 9 months, but the past 7 months have been good with the help of Dr Itua herbal medicine which I took for 4 weeks.
    I have been off Onglyza now, for 7 months, and simply 100% improvement with the help of Dr Itua. I had none of these issues except a history of pancreatitis in my distant past.
    I will recommend anyone here with health problem to contact Dr Itua on drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com and whatsapp +2348149277967 also he ccure the following disease with his herbal medicines Hiv/Aids,Herpes,Copd, Glaucoma, Cataracts,Macular degeneration,Cardiovascular disease,Lung disease, Enlarged prostate, Alzheimer's disease, Dementia. Fibroid,Diabete, Multiple Sclerosis, Hypertension,Fibromyalgia,Hiv, Hepatitis B, Liver/Kidney Inflammatory,parkinson,cancer,als.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I was diagnosed as HEPATITIS B carrier in 2013 with fibrosis of the
    liver already present. I started on antiviral medications which
    reduced the viral load initially. After a couple of years the virus
    became resistant. I started on HEPATITIS B Herbal treatment from
    ULTIMATE LIFE CLINIC (www.ultimatelifeclinic.com) in March, 2020. Their
    treatment totally reversed the virus. I did another blood test after
    the 6 months long treatment and tested negative to the virus. Amazing
    treatment! This treatment is a breakthrough for all HBV carriers.

    ReplyDelete